Content developed with the assistance of AI tools and reviewed by the author.
Why a CJEU referral makes filing urgent for Brazilian descendants of a pre-1948 Italian female line
Your grandmother was Italian. Her son — your grandfather — was born in 1941. Under the law in force at the time, she could not pass her citizenship to him. That single fact — her gender and the year of his birth — explains why rather than booking a consulate appointment.
This is the 1948 rule. It is not a technicality. It is a recognised judicial doctrine, confirmed by Italy's superior courts, that gives you a genuine path to Italian citizenship. But the path changed in 2025, and as of October 2026 it is the subject of a live referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union. If your line runs through a woman who gave birth before 1 January 1948, the decision whether to file now should be made within days, not months, not the next few months.
Yes. The judicial route exists precisely for this situation. Italian citizenship, transmitted through a female ancestor whose child was born before 1 January 1948, was blocked by Law No. 555 of 13 June 1912, which permitted only fathers to pass nationality to their children. Law No. 91 of 5 February 1992 restored transmission through women for births after that date but could not retroactively cure an already-interrupted line. The Italian Constitutional Court, and then the Italian Court of Cassation, United Sections, recognised that this created an unjustifiable discrimination. The court route — giudiziale — is the remedy.
The critical date is not when your Italian great-grandmother was born, nor when she emigrated to Brazil. The critical date is when her child was born. If that child was born on or before 31 December 1947, the citizenship transmission was blocked under the 1912 law, and only a court can restore it. This is the single point most competitor blogs get wrong. Many focus on the female ancestor herself. What matters is the birth of her child.
Since the territorial reform introduced by Law No. 26 of 28 April 2022, jurisdiction no longer rests exclusively with the courts in Rome. The competent court is the Immigration Section (sezione specializzata in materia di immigrazione) of the Tribunal in the municipality where the Italian ancestor was born. If your great-grandmother was born in Bergamo, you file in Bergamo. If she was born in a small comune whose court has since been merged, you file in the relevant provincial capital that absorbed that jurisdiction.
This matters practically. Rome was overloaded. Regional courts are, in many cases, faster. It also means the filing package / document bundle must be presented to a specific judge in a specific registry, and that the procedural rules of that court — including how certified translations are accepted — apply.
You do not need to travel to Italy to file. Proceedings can be initiated through an Italian lawyer holding a power of attorney (procura speciale), authenticated and apostilled in Brazil. Your personal presence is not required unless the court orders it, which is uncommon at the filing stage in citizenship matters.
Nemo plus iuris transferre potest quam ipse habet — no one can transfer more rights than they themselves hold. The principle has a sharp edge here. Law No. 74 of 19 July 2025, converting Decree-Law No. 36/2025, introduced Article 3-bis into Law 91/1992. It created a generational cap: citizenship by descent (iure sanguinis) is now formally limited to those who can demonstrate an Italian parent or grandparent. A great-grandparent line — the precise scenario of many Brazilian applicants — would, on a literal reading, fall outside the consular route.
The Ministry of the Interior then issued a circular in May 2025 attempting to apply this cap to court filings as well. That move was contested immediately by practitioners. The argument is straightforward: the court route is a constitutional remedy for a discrimination the legislature already created. Applying the cap to court proceedings would simply reintroduce the discrimination the courts were called to correct.
Constitutional Court Ruling No. 63 of 2026 upheld Article 3-bis as constitutionally legitimate for the administrative route. It did not, however, definitively resolve whether the cap extends to judicial proceedings in pre-1948 maternal lines. Order No. 147 of 2026, issued jointly by the Tribunals of Mantua and Campobasso, referred that precise question to the Court of Justice of the European Union, asking whether Article 3-bis, as interpreted to include court filings, is compatible with EU law on citizenship and non-discrimination.
That referral is live. It has not been decided. Until it is, Italian courts handling 1948 cases are in a legally uncertain position. Some will proceed. Some may suspend proceedings pending the CJEU's answer.
Unlike in most common-law systems — including Brazilian practice under the inventário framework, where citizenship questions are generally administrative — Italian citizenship by descent flows from a judicial declaration with a specific procedural date attached to it. The date on which your case is filed with the court creates a procedural record. If the CJEU ultimately rules that the generational cap cannot be applied to judicial proceedings, applications already filed before any contrary domestic interpretation crystallises will be in a stronger position. If you have not filed, you will be subject to whatever domestic rule is in force when you do.
Italian Court of Cassation, United Sections, Ruling No. 24045 of 2026 (Cass. civ., Sezioni Unite, sentenza n. 24045 del 2026) closed the so-called 'minor issue' in pre-1948 maternal-line cases: the Court confirmed that the birth of the relevant child before 1948 is the only triggering condition, and that no further factual threshold applies to the interruption analysis. That ruling gives the judicial route a cleaner evidentiary foundation than it had before 2026. But it did not address the generational cap, which remains the open question before the CJEU.
The practical implication: file now, before the CJEU procedure produces either a restrictive preliminary ruling or a domestic court practice of systematically staying 1948 cases.
No, not to file. You do need to prepare a document bundle that Italian courts will accept. For a Brazilian applicant, that means obtaining civil-status records from the relevant Brazilian cartório — birth certificates, marriage certificates, death certificates — going back to the Italian ancestor. Those documents must carry an apostille issued by the Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), which has been the competent Brazilian apostille authority since Brazil joined the Hague Apostille Convention in 2016.
The apostilled documents then require a certified translation into Italian. Translations prepared in Brazil for Brazilian use are not automatically accepted. They must meet Italian formatting standards. In our files, the most common delay at the filing stage is not missing documents but documents that are complete and correctly apostilled yet prepared in a format the court's registry returns — wrong translator certification, missing consecutive page numbering, or a cartório extract that is a summary rather than a full-form certificate. Your Italian lawyer will flag these before submission, not after.
Italy and Brazil have no bilateral agreement on the direct recognition of civil-status documents, so the apostille chain is the only route. Conversely, if the Italian court issues a judgment recognising your citizenship, the effect on the Brazilian side will need to be assessed by your Brazilian lawyer — Italy's judgment does not automatically update Brazilian civil status.
The core bundle is the same for every iure sanguinis application, but the 1948 route adds one item that consular applications rarely require: a pleading demonstrating that the interruption occurred precisely because of the sex of the Italian ancestor and the pre-1948 birth of her child. That legal argument is the engine of the case.
Document-side, you will need: full-form birth, marriage and death certificates for every generation in the Italian line from the ancestor to yourself; Italian civil-status records for the female ancestor and her Italian-born relatives, obtainable from the relevant Italian comune; proof that no generation in the line acquired another citizenship in circumstances that would have caused automatic loss of Italian citizenship before 1992 (this is the naturalisation-loss analysis); and a current certificato di stato di famiglia storico, the historical family register extract from the Italian municipality, which the court requests from the comune directly but which you may need to prompt.
The approximate cost of assembling this bundle in Brazil, including cartório fees, CNJ apostilles and certified translations, ranges from BRL 2,000 to BRL 5,000 depending on the number of generations and the accessibility of the records. Legal fees in Italy for the judicial procedure are separate and depend on the complexity of the case and the court.
Timing: Italian citizenship courts vary. Some 1948 cases in regional tribunals have concluded within 18 to 24 months of filing. Rome-based cases historically ran longer. Since the 2022 territorial reform, regional courts have absorbed caseload, but the current legal uncertainty created by the CJEU referral may extend timelines if courts elect to stay proceedings pending the EU ruling.
My great-grandmother was Italian but her son (my grandfather) was born in Brazil in 1943. Does the 1948 rule still apply?
Yes. The 1948 rule turns on where the child was born only in the sense that the birth must have occurred before 1 January 1948. It does not require the child to have been born in Italy. A Brazilian-born child of an Italian mother, born in 1943, falls squarely within the pre-1948 maternal-line rule. The court route applies.
The consulate told me my line is too far back. Is the court route still open?
The consulate applies the administrative rules under Law 91/1992 as amended by Law 74/2025, including the parent-or-grandparent cap. The court route is a separate, judicially supervised proceeding based on constitutional law and Italian Court of Cassation jurisprudence. A consulate refusal or rejection does not close the court route. The referral currently pending before the CJEU relates to whether the cap can be applied to court proceedings at all.
Can I apply for Italian citizenship for my children at the same time?
If the Italian court recognises your citizenship, the effect flows forward to your children by descent. Minor children may be included in the application or filed separately once the parent's citizenship is confirmed. Given the generational-cap uncertainty, the most cautious approach is to include all relevant descendants in the initial filing — your Italian lawyer experienced in 1948 proceedings can structure the application accordingly.
HREFLANG BLOCK:
Editorial Team — Panato Law Firm Staff
