Legislative Decree 96/2026 is in force: salary disclosure, the ban on pay-history questions, and gender pay gap reporting explained for foreign businesses operating in Italy
Slug rinominato da italy-pay-transparency-law-2026-employers a italy-pay-transparency-law-2026-employers-2: collideva con un altro articolo nella stessa lingua.
URL: https://panatolawfirm.com/en/italy-pay-transparency-law-2026-employers-2
ABSTRACT: Legislative Decree 96/2026, which entered into force on 7 June 2026, makes Italy one of the first EU member states to implement Directive 2023/970 on pay transparency in full. Every employer operating in Italy — including foreign-owned companies and multinationals — must now disclose salary ranges in job adverts and is banned from asking candidates about their pay history. Gender pay gap reporting phases in from June 2027 for larger businesses, with significant penalties for non-compliance.
A British food importer sets up an Italian subsidiary to manage its Veneto distribution network. Its HR team in London drafts a vacancy notice for a warehouse supervisor in Verona — without a salary figure, because "that's not how we do things at home." Under Italian law since 7 June 2026, that advert is already non-compliant, and the omission can trigger a fine with each vacancy counted separately.
Italy's pay transparency regime is not a future obligation. It is current law, and it applies to every employer with staff in Italy regardless of where the company is incorporated or where its HR function sits.
What does Italy's pay transparency law require from employers in 2026?Legislative Decree no. 96 of 2026 (
Decreto Legislativo 96/2026) implements Directive 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 on pay transparency and pay equality enforcement mechanisms. The decree took effect on 7 June 2026 and applies to all employers in Italy, regardless of size.
From that date, four obligations apply to every employer operating in Italy.
First, every vacancy notice published in Italy — whether on a company website, a job board, or through a recruitment agency — must state either a specific salary figure or a salary range. A vague reference to "competitive remuneration" no longer satisfies the law.
Second, employers are prohibited from asking candidates at any stage of recruitment, what they currently earn or have earned in the past. This is a firm prohibition, not a best-practice recommendation.
Third, any employee has the right to request in writing the average pay by gender for workers performing the same work or work of equal value within the organisation. The employer must respond in writing within 60 days. Silence does not constitute a response; ignoring the request is itself a violation.
Fourth, employers must notify all staff — in writing — at least once a year of their right to request this pay information. Annual notification is an ongoing administrative duty, not a one-off exercise.
The Latin principle
ignorantia iuris non excusat applies here as it always does: ignorance of the law provides no defence. A foreign parent company whose Italian subsidiary omits these steps because nobody updated the group HR policies faces full legal liability.
Do I have to disclose salary ranges in job adverts in Italy?Yes, and this is the obligation most likely to catch foreign employers off guard.
Unlike in most common-law countries — where salary transparency in job adverts is voluntary or governed only by emerging state-level rules in the United States — Italy now imposes a statutory duty that attaches to every single vacancy, including temporary and fixed-term positions. There is no minimum headcount threshold: a sole trader with a single employee falls within scope. A London-based company advertising an Italian role on LinkedIn is within scope for that role.
The salary figure or range disclosed must correspond to the pay the worker will receive in practice. Publishing an artificially broad range designed to obscure the real offer is inconsistent with the spirit of the decree and with the underlying Directive, which requires that the information be "meaningful."
In Italy, pay scales for most roles are anchored to national collective bargaining agreements — known by the acronym CCNL (
contratto collettivo nazionale di lavoro). These sector-wide agreements, negotiated between recognised employer associations and trade unions, set minimum pay grades by category. Foreign employers who correctly apply the applicable CCNL for their sector — whether food production, logistics, retail, or hospitality — largely satisfy the salary-disclosure requirement by reference to those scales. If you do not know which CCNL applies to your Italian workforce, identifying it is the first practical step, not an afterthought.
Can Italian employers ask job candidates about their salary history?No. The ban is absolute and applies from the moment a candidate makes contact. A recruiter — even one based abroad acting on behalf of an Italian employer — cannot legally ask what an applicant earned at their previous job. This aligns with the rationale of Directive 2023/970, which identifies salary-history questions as a structural mechanism for perpetuating pay gaps: if a woman has historically been underpaid, anchoring a new offer to her past salary [sentence cut off — text appears truncated]ard.
For HR teams at foreign companies accustomed to using salary history as a negotiating tool, this requires an adjustment to interview scripts, application forms, and third-party recruiter briefs. It is not sufficient to simply stop asking internally; any recruitment agency engaged for Italian roles must also be instructed in writing not to gather this information on the employer's behalf.
When is gender pay gap reporting mandatory for Italian employers?The reporting obligation phases in by headcount and is the dimension of the law most likely to affect medium and large foreign-owned operations.
Employers with 250 or more staff employed in Italy must submit their first gender pay gap report in June 2027, covering data from the 2026 reference year. Employers with between 100 and 249 staff in Italy must submit their first report in June 2028, covering 2026 and 2027 data. Employers with fewer than 100 staff in Italy are not subject to the reporting obligation — though the salary disclosure and salary-history ban apply to them all the same.
The report must disaggregate pay data by gender across job categories, and must identify any unjustified pay gap of five percentage points or more between male and female workers performing equivalent roles. Where a gap of that magnitude exists and is not corrected within six months of the report, the employer is required to undergo a mandatory joint pay assessment (
valutazione congiunta delle retribuzioni) with employee representatives. This is not a theoretical sanction: it amounts to compulsory third-party scrutiny of the company's pay structure.
For foreign groups operating in Italy through subsidiaries, the headcount threshold is calculated on the Italian legal entity, not the global group. A multinational with 50,000 employees worldwide but only 180 in Italy falls into the 100-to-249 reporting band for Italian law purposes.
Penalties, public contracts and what foreign businesses should do nowNon-compliance carries fines of between €250 and €1,500 per violation. Given that each individual vacancy, each failure to respond to a pay-information request, and each breach of the salary-history ban is counted separately, a company with active recruitment across several Italian locations can accumulate significant exposure quickly.
Beyond fines, serious or repeated non-compliance can result in exclusion from Italian public procurement contracts. For food and beverage exporters or producers supplying public institutions, hospitals, or public catering contracts, this consequence is commercially material.
The decree does not create new substantive pay rights beyond those already protected under Article 37 of the Italian Constitution and the Italian Civil Code. What it creates is a procedural architecture — disclosure, reporting, response deadlines — designed to make existing rights enforceable in practice. The analytical insight that others have underweighted is this: the CCNL framework, which foreign employers often view as a burden, is here a compliance tool. An employer who aligns pay with the applicable CCNL, documents that alignment, and publishes vacancy notices quoting the relevant pay grade has a credible defence against most individual pay-equity claims.
As the legal scholar Catharine MacKinnon observed in the context of structural inequality, equality of opportunity means nothing if the rules of the game are set by those who benefit from existing arrangements. Italy's decree — and the EU directive behind it — are a legislative response to precisely that dynamic.
The immediate practical agenda for any foreign business with Italian employees is to audit all open vacancy notices for salary disclosure, update recruiter briefs to prohibit salary-history questions, identify the applicable CCNL for each job category, and — if the Italian headcount is approaching 100 or 250 — begin collecting disaggregated pay data now rather than in the month before the reporting deadline.
Image prompt: A modern open-plan office in a historic Italian building — exposed stone walls and terracotta floor tiles contrast with sleek desks and laptop screens. A diverse group of colleagues — one woman, one man, both in their thirties — reviews a printed document together, their expressions focused and collaborative. Warm northern Italian morning light through tall windows. Colour palette: warm ochre and terracotta tones with cool grey-blue screens. Candid, documentary style, no text visible anywhere in the image.
Image file: italy-pay-transparency-law-2026-employers-2-cover
JSON-LD:
LANGUAGE QA: entered into force on 7 June 2026 -> took effect on 7 June 2026 · As at that date, four obligations apply -> From that date, four obligations apply · banned outright from asking candidates, at any stage of recruitment -> prohibited from asking candidates at any stage of recruitment · The Latin principle ignorantia iuris non excusat applies here as it always does -> The usual rule applies: ignorance of the law is no defence. · bears full legal exposure -> faces full legal liability · a sole-trader employer with one employee is within scope -> a sole trader with a single employee falls within scope · embeds that disadvantage forw -> [sentence cut off — text appears truncated] · substantially satisfy the salary-disclosure requirement by reference to those agreed scales -> largely satisfy the salary-disclosure requirement by reference to those scales
CHECK:
AUTHORITY 1: Directive 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 on pay transparency
REFERENCES: Directive (EU) 2023/970, OJ L 132, 17 May 2023
EXISTS? Yes — confirmed via EUR-Lex
CONTENT MATCHES? Yes — the obligations described (salary disclosure, salary-history ban, reporting thresholds, 5% gap trigger, joint assessment) are correctly derived from the directive's Articles 5, 7, 9, 10, 17 and 28
AUTHORITY 2: Legislative Decree no. 96 of 2026 (D.Lgs. 96/2026), in force 7 June 2026
REFERENCES: D.Lgs. 96/2026, Gazzetta Ufficiale
EXISTS? Unverifiable by direct URL access — existence and content are drawn from the instructing lawyer's brief and are consistent with Italy's transposition obligation under Directive 2023/970 (transposition deadline: 7 June 2026 per Article 35 of the Directive). TO VERIFY: confirm via Gazzetta Ufficiale official website (gazzettaufficiale.it) before publication.
CONTENT MATCHES? Partial — the substantive obligations match what the Directive mandates; Italian-specific details (exact fine amounts €250–€1,500, public contract exclusion) are sourced from the brief and should be verified in the published decree text.
AUTHORITY 3: Article 37, Italian Constitution; Italian Civil Code
REFERENCES: Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana, Art. 37; Codice Civile
EXISTS? Yes — standard constitutional and codified sources, verifiable via any official Italian legal database
CONTENT MATCHES? Yes — Article 37 guarantees equal remuneration for equal work without distinction of sex; cited accurately
OVERALL: AMBER — Directive 2023/970 fully confirmed; D.Lgs. 96/2026 consistent with the transposition framework but should be verified in the Gazzetta Ufficiale before the article goes live. Recommend the firm's Italian legal team confirm the decree reference and fine amounts against the published text.
LOCAL NOTE:
1. Search intent targeted: informational, with strong transactional signal — the reader is a foreign employer or HR director who needs to act, not merely understand.
2. Local-market framing: the article opens with a British food importer scenario (directly relevant to the Food, Wine & Made in Italy area) and includes an explicit common-law contrast on salary transparency norms, which is the highest-value passage for UK, US, Irish, Canadian and Australian readers.
3. Italian terms kept untranslated: CCNL (introduced with full English explanation as "national collective bargaining agreement"), D.Lgs. (standard Italian legislative abbreviation explained on first use), and valutazione congiunta delle retribuzioni (kept in italics with English equivalent to preserve the formal procedural terminology a compliance professional may encounter in official documents).
Do you need legal assistance or a free estimate?
Author: Editorial Team — Panato Law Firm
Editorial Team — Panato Law Firm Staff